The Role of Tooth Extractions in Managing Bimaxillary Protrusion: A Guide for General Dentists

As general dentists, you often see patients concerned with their "buck teeth" or a "puffy" facial profile. This common presentation, known as bimaxillary protrusion, is characterized by both the upper and lower anterior teeth being excessively proclined, often leading to full or protrusive lips and a strained mentalis muscle when the lips are at rest. 

Successfully treating bimaxillary protrusion goes beyond just straightening teeth. The goals are both esthetic and functional: creating a more harmonious facial profile, achieving lip competence (the ability to comfortably close the lips without strain), and establishing a stable, functional occlusion. 

Why Tooth Extractions Are Often the Treatment of Choice 

When the anterior teeth are significantly proclined and the goal is to retract them to improve the facial profile, space is needed. In many cases of bimaxillary protrusion, this space is best created by extracting teeth and the most common extraction pattern involves the removal of the four first premolars (one in each quadrant). 

This approach allows the orthodontist to: 

• Retract the incisors: 

  The space created is used to pull the incisors backward, reducing their protrusion. 

• Reduce lip procumbency: 

  As the incisors are retracted, the lips naturally follow, leading to a flatter, more relaxed facial profile. 

• Correct the bite: 

  The space can also be used to align the posterior teeth and establish a proper Class I relationship. 

Considerations Before Making the Extraction Decision 

Deciding to extract teeth is a significant step that requires careful diagnosis and planning. Before proceeding, it's very important to evaluate several factors: 

• Skeletal Pattern: A patient's underlying skeletal pattern (e.g., Class I, II, or III) heavily influences the treatment plan. While extractions are often effective for Class I skeletal patterns with dental protrusion, their role may be different in complex skeletal cases. 

• Patient Growth Stage: For younger, still-growing patients, a non-extraction approach may sometimes be considered to modify growth. As for adults, extractions are often the most predictable way to achieve the desired esthetic changes. 

• Esthetic Goals and Oral Health: Always discuss the patient's esthetic concerns. Do they want a flatter profile? Is their primary concern to close a lip gap? A comprehensive clinical and radiographic examination is also essential to ensure the patient's periodontal health can withstand orthodontic forces. 

The Role of Clear Aligners in Extraction Cases 

While historically more challenging, modern aligner systems, have advanced features that can facilitate controlled tooth movements. 

Advantages of using clear aligners for extraction-based retraction: 

• Improved esthetics during treatment: Patients can undergo treatment without the visibility of traditional braces. 

• Better oral hygiene: Aligners are removable, allowing for easier brushing and flossing. 

• Controlled, staged movement: Aligners are programmed to move teeth incrementally, which can be predictable when planned correctly. 

Limitations to consider: 

• Patient compliance: Aligners require excellent patient compliance (22+ hours/day wear). 

• Case complexity: While effective for many cases, complex or highly difficult retractions may still be more efficiently treated with traditional fixed appliances, which offer different biomechanical advantages. It's crucial for the treating dentist to know when to refer. 

Alternatives and Adjuncts to Consider 

Not all cases of bimaxillary protrusion require extractions. In mild cases, space can sometimes be gained through: 

• Interproximal Reduction (IPR): This procedure creates minimal space between teeth through precise enamel reshaping. It can assist with minor alignment needs; however, its anterior-posterior effect is minimal, and its contribution to facial profile improvements is very limited. 
   

• Distalization: Moving the posterior teeth backward to create space for the incisors. This is often enhanced by the use of Skeletal Anchorage Devices (SADs), such as Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs). SADs provide a stable point of anchorage, allowing for more efficient and predictable tooth movement without reciprocal forces on other teeth. This approach can be a viable alternative to extractions in select cases. 

 
Profile Impact of First Premolar Extractions 

One of the most important considerations when planning extractions for bimaxillary protrusion is how removing teeth affects the face. First premolars sit in a position that directly influences lip support, so extracting them can create the space needed for meaningful anterior retraction. 

When the incisors are retracted into this space, several facial changes may occur: 

Reduction in Lip Fullness: 
As the upper and lower incisors move backward, the lips typically follow. This can reduce excessive lip strain, allow easier lip closure, and soften a “puffy” or protrusive look. 

Improved Facial Balance: 
For patients whose profile appears forward or convex due to dental protrusion, retraction can bring the lips into better alignment with the nose and chin, creating a more balanced facial outline. 

Better Mentalis Muscle Function: 
Patients who struggle to close their lips without strain often rely on the mentalis muscle to compensate. Retraction can reduce this strain, improving rest posture and overall facial relaxation. 

Predictable Esthetic Change: 
Unlike IPR or minor arch expansion, extracting first premolars provides enough space to produce visible, clinically meaningful changes in lip position. This is often the deciding factor for patients who list profile improvement as a primary goal. 

It’s important to counsel patients that not every case will result in dramatic facial changes. The degree of improvement depends on the starting inclination of the incisors, soft-tissue thickness, and the quality of anchorage control throughout treatment. 

Risks and Patient Counseling 

As with any treatment, it's vital to have an open and honest conversation with the patient about potential risks and outcomes. 

• Occlusion: Extractions can impact the final occlusion. Proper planning is critical to ensure a stable bite and jaw joint health. 

• Expectations with Clear Aligners: Discuss the importance of compliance and potential limitations. While aligners are powerful, some cases may require additional auxiliaries to achieve the ideal result. 

Conclusion and Practical Advice 

The decision to use extractions to manage bimaxillary protrusion is a base of modern orthodontics. It is often the most predictable and effective way to achieve both a beautiful smile and a harmonious facial profile. For general dentists, understanding the fundamentals is key: 

• Diagnose: Look beyond the "crowding" and evaluate the facial profile, lip competence, and skeletal pattern. 

• Plan: Understand that extractions are a tool for creating space and retracting teeth. 

• Communicate: Have an informed discussion with your patient, setting realistic expectations and explaining the benefits and risks. 

• Collaborate: Know when to refer to an orthodontic specialist. The use of clear aligners in extraction cases is a growing field, and a specialist can provide the expertise needed to manage these complex cases to achieve the best possible esthetic and functional outcomes. 

By taking all these factors into consideration, you can guide your patients toward the right treatment path, whether that involves extractions, clear aligners, or a combination of approaches, ultimately delivering a result that is both esthetically pleasing and functionally stable. 

Not sure if extractions are the right call for your case? A second set of trained eyes can make the difference. Register your account to receive a free evaluation.